You can read my review of Matthew’s fine book over at Jesus Creed:
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/jesuscreed/2013/08/31/saturday-book-review-matthew-lee-anderson/
You can read my review of Matthew’s fine book over at Jesus Creed:
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/jesuscreed/2013/08/31/saturday-book-review-matthew-lee-anderson/
In his endlessly fascinating book, Mason Currey gives us a peak into the inner motivations of writers, artists, and other creative types.
One of my favorite shows is “In Depth” on Book TV. And my favorite part of that show is where we are given access to the writing spaces of the featured author. Having watched that show for many years confirms that no two writers have the same pattern. Every writer (or creative type) is unique. Currey also makes this plain in his wonderfully wrought book.
Here a few, other things I took away from reading Currey’s book:
*The power of good habits and the struggle to develop them!
*Creative folks must create. There is a drive, even compulsion to do so.
*It is wise to have a steady means of income as it is difficult, especially at first, to make a living in the creative arena.
*Find your own voice because no one else has it!
One of my favorite books is How Proust Can Change Your LIfe. It is less than two hundred pages, but jam packed with wonderful insights. The author is an engaging and winsome writer. And he is an atheist. His view of the world is much different than mine, but he has a terrific way of explaining important matters.
Here is a two minute clip of the author explaining what great literature can do:
Last week I wrote a short piece on ghost-writing. Scot McKnight over at Jesus Creed kindly posted it this past Saturday. It generated quite a bit of discussion which I thought some of the readers here may want to know about.
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/jesuscreed/2013/08/24/is-ghost-writing-unchristian/
I know. The title sounds like the start of a joke.
Here is what atheist, Richard Dawkins, tweeted when Benedict made it public he would retire:
“I feel sorry for the Pope and all old Catholic priests. Imagine having a wasted life to look back on and no sex.”
(Richard Dawkins, Tweet, Feb. 11, 2013)
Sex must take on a sort of transcendence if you are an atheist/materialist like Dawkins. That is the truly pathetic thing!
It is a well-known and regularly retrieved saying, but do we really believe “the pen is mightier than the sword?”
It seems the sword is being employed a lot these days. It also seems right to conclude that the sword being used so often is proof that it works. Why else use it?
Christians extol the power of the Word. God’s Word is “…living and active, sharper than any two-edged sword…” (Heb. 4:12)
When I observe governments grabbing the sword as the first or only option, I know their ideas must not be very compelling.
Poet, playwright, writer/Czech Republic president (in that order!) said, “I really do inhabit a system in which words are capable of shaking the entire structure of government, where words can prove mightier than ten military divisions.”
A sad and sobering reflection by one of our greatest living writers, especially the twenty-five seconds of 5:15-5:40:
It is easy for couples going through a divorce to be so focused on their own hurts that they fail to realize the massive ripple effect on others: children, families on both sides, and friends.
I wonder if those contemplating divorce could actually see the entire crowd of people who will be forever affected whether this might help slow down the breaking up of couples. Only God knows. The reality however remains.
Divorce does not just involve two people, but many other folks as well.